Three underlying rules one means the foundation to own combining design viewpoints; this type of principles are:

Three underlying rules one means the foundation to own combining design viewpoints; this type of principles are:

Include Descriptive Features

Kinds giving the latest detailed properties off agencies : Examples of detailed properties is: colour, size, location, big date, term, and number.

In this action off local evaluate modeling, the latest descriptive attributes is actually put in the latest in earlier times laid out agencies. Merely unmarried-valued services are permitted for the breakdown from an entity.

Consolidate Local Views and you will Structure Views

Combine Local Views and you will Framework viewpoints : Integration of your local views on the just one information’ build try the major effort on the analytical database build. It is right here your separate views and applications try good to the a prospective database.

Name : Name are a notion which means associated issues when a couple of or even more factors are exactly the same, or features a personality relationship, when they synonyms. Although the term design is simple, brand new determination off synonyms isn’t. About useless data symbol steps, the content of data semantics is bound. Normally, an in-depth comprehension of the consumer environment is needed to determine if synonyms occur. Deciding whether equivalent meanings can be resolved so you’re able to similar definitions, or if one of many most other ability dating most enforce, need an obvious and intricate understanding of associate characteristics and you may studies demands.

Aggregation : Aggregation try a notion in which a relation between points is actually thought to getting various other large-peak ability. Such, “EMPLOYEE” E” , “SSN” , and you can “ADDRESS” . Of many aggregations are easy to pick given that biggest data habits need syntax that can show aggregations.

Generalization : Generalization are a concept in which a team of equivalent elements is believed of once the a single general ability of the inhibiting the differences between her or him. For example, the latest organization “EMPLOYEE” is regarded as good generalization out of “FACTORY-WORKER”, “OFFICE-WORKER”, and you can “EXECUTIVE”. An exemplory instance of some of these three products is additionally an example of brand new generalized “EMPLOYEE”. Care and attention need to be drawn to not ever mistake they having aggregation. An analogy for aggregation was pieces making up an effective “whole”, and you may generalization is the “whole”.

Due to the fact aggregation and you can generalization are equivalent for the construction and you can application, one element may participate in one another aggregation and generalization dating.

Inferences might be pulled towards aggregation aspect in the generalization measurement, and you may vice versa, elizabeth.g., it may be inferred that every instance of “EXECUTIVE” is also an enthusiastic aggregation out-of Name, SSN, and you will Target. Select Figure dos.5.13-8.

You will find around three consolidation items; these kinds can be shared in different ways to build any kind of relationships between items (elements) in various representative opinions. By the merging integration items, effective and you can state-of-the-art matchmaking might be represented. Most semantic matchmaking try depicted because of the certain consolidation, and tend to be detailed because after the:

Label Consolidation : Two stuff can be semantically the same into the most option of with the same labels. Homonyms have to be safeguarded up against plus similar, yet not similar items. Similarity is the better shown playing with aggregation and you will generalization once the a check toward feel of the combination, and you can member feedback. When the an item from Member evaluate is positioned to be similar to an item from Member next view, neither ones things is also participate next in just about any almost every other term consolidations ranging from both of these opinions. That is genuine due to the fact for each and every target is believed are unique during the framework of their own local associate take a look at.

Aggregation Integration : This might take place in a couple versions; the difference relies on whether among the many pages enjoys given the new aggregated “whole” object. A good example of the simpler mode is where Affiliate step one have specified a great amount of stuff without and then make people combination method of dating between them, elizabeth.g., an inventory view of “HANDLEBARS” , “WHEELS” , “SEATS” , and you may “FRAMES” . Yet not, User dos has actually specified an object, “BICYCLE” , which is an aggregation of Affiliate are things. Brand new conceptually harder sort of aggregation occurs when both pages has actually specified particular otherwise all of the components of a keen unmentioned “whole”. As an example, when separate collection properties try maintained getting basic, non-adjustable bits (Frames, WHEELS) as well as pieces which are replaced because of the customers request (Chair, HANDLEBARS). Such aggregation is far more tough to know since none representative keeps outlined a bike target.

برچسب‌ها: بدون برچسب

یک دیدگاه بنویسید

آدرس ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. فیلدهای الزامی با * نشان گذاری شده اند